Jurgen Briand vs Andrew Paulson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W W L L L L
Form
W L W W L W W L L LH2H: Briand 2 - 1 Paulson
They have played 7 sets in total, with Briand winning 5 and Paulson winning 2. The last match between Briand and Paulson was at the M25 Jablonec nad Nisou, 26-05-2022, Second, Clay with Andrew Paulson getting the victory 2-6 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jurgen Briand | 2 |
| Andrew Paulson | 1 |
M25 Jablonec nad Nisou(26-05-2022)
2
6
6
2
6
2
| Briand | Stats | Paulson |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-2) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 898 | Ranking | 508 |
| 403 | Highest Rank | 302 |
| 26 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 7 |
| 60% (157-106) | Career Total W/L | 63% (168-100) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Andrew Paulson
Player
Jurgen Briand
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
51%
(
41 of
80)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Andrew Paulson
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-1 |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Andrew Paulson
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
92)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 35 | Games Won | 24 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:38:20 | Average Match Time | 1:38:20 |
| 57% (111/196) | 1st Serve % | 63% (135/216) |
| 71% (79/111) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (81/135) |
| 58% (49/85) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (40/81) |
| 32% (9/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (4/14) |
| 44% (95/216) | Return Points Win % | 35% (68/196) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jurgen Briand Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Jurgen Briand
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
5
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Jurgen Briand
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Jurgen Briand
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
8
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Jurgen Briand
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Daniil Glinka
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Maik Steiner
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Jurgen Briand
59%
(
79 of
134)
1st Serve %
49%
(
52 of
107)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
40 of
52)
51%
(
28 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
50 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Jurgen Briand
69%
(
65 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Jurgen Briand
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Jakub Paul
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Andrew Paulson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Robert Guna
Player
Andrew Paulson
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
73%
(
19 of
26)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
34
Total Points Won
33
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlo Alberto Caniato
Player
Andrew Paulson
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Andrew Paulson
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
14 of
22)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Marko Topo
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
6
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Andrew Paulson
64%
(
69 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
70 of
118)
14
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
34 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
47 of
118)
121
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Michael Vrbensky
62%
(
69 of
111)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
38 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
109)
112
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Andrew Paulson
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Stefano Napolitano
56%
(
60 of
108)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
9
Aces
11
9
Double Faults
3
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (157/106) | Win/Loss | 63% (168/100) |
| 60% (359/239) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (371/241) |
| 55% (2985/2457) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3095/2664) |
| 61% (38/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (26/14) |
| 60% (72/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (92/56) |
| 58% (47/34) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (50/30) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 590 | Aces Total | 1054 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 573 | Total Double Faults | 741 |
| 1:6:45 | Average Match Time | 1:32:10 |
| 237.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 471.07 |
| 56% (6925/12286) | 1st Serve % | 60% (10123/16867) |
| 68% (4682/6925) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (7150/10123) |
| 49% (2631/5361) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3454/6744) |
| 43% (570/1334) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (753/1817) |
| 42% (5095/12155) | Return Points Win % | 40% (6933/17276) |
| 50% (20/20) | Challenger W/L | 49% (46/48) |
| 61% (137/86) | Futures W/L | 70% (122/52) |
| 61% (157/258) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (166/262) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (35/71) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (41/72) |
| 41% (30/73) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (45/80) |
| 87% (167/145) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (168/149) |
| 13% (167/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (168/19) |
| 13% (96/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (100/20) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
